As a 2nd grader I remember being the last person picked for the spelling bee.  The teacher divided the class into two teams.  The best two spellers were named team captains.  They took turns picking who would be on each team.  I still remember sitting at my desk as everyone else was chosen. I was not going to be chosen; I was simply the last person left.  I had to be picked.

In many ways this was a good life lesson – sometimes you don’t get picked first.

A number of weeks ago someone sent me an article, I can’t remember who wrote it or who sent it, but the theme has stuck with me.  The article asks a question – does the church function like an institution or a city?  According to the author, institutions exist to screen people out – an individual must qualify for a job or a program.  Cities always expand to include everyone – there is space for the homeless, the renter, the homeowner, the uneducated, the educated, the poor, the rich.

It doesn’t take years of theological studies to figure out that Jesus was interested in making space for everyone.   That’s the essential message of John 3:16.  It also does not take many years of study to figure that the historical trajectory of the church has been one of finding ways to screen people out.

What would it mean for the church to renounce the path of exclusion and to become a place of inclusion?  How do we become less white and less male?  What does it mean to invite others into our community?  Inclusion also includes folks who don’t get it – the racist and sexist. What does this look like?

And just how far do we take this diversity thing?  It is one thing to talk about cultural and theological diversity, but quite another thing to talk about sexual orientation.

It is my hope that our future can be one of figuring out how to filter people in.  This will not be easy or without controversy, but it does seem to be the Jesus thing to do.



Filed under Class, label, labels, ministry

2 responses to “Filter

  1. Glenn Runnalls

    there is a problem with the metaphor.

    first, i’m not sure how helpful the city is for the analogy you are trying get across. which city?

    compare Singapore and Nairobi.

    i suspect that cities (and their neighborhoods) can be charted as more or less institutional and that institutions themselves can be charted as having more or less openness and more or less direction.

    and this isn’t about some via media, it is more about how we see openness. are the borderlines boundaries or barriers?

    what does it mean to make space for the racist and the sexist but quite another things for those who are caught up in the heteronormative/queer divide.

    all that to say, i wonder whether you are asking what the church can do to make sure that she is not making the gate/bridge any narrower than Jesus would?

  2. Holy COW Glenn! You think EVERYONE should have a place in the church?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s